Hecksel Family Web Site

Belleville Weather
Charger | LX | LX of MI |
AvSig | AOPA | Mooney Pilots | AvWeb | Landings | EAA |
Mercola | The Omnivore | thincs.org | |
subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link
subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link
subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link
subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link
subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link

Dangerous Statin Drugs

Statin Drugs and Cholesterol Levels
Statin drugs such as Lipitor, Zocor, etc are excellent at reducing blood serum cholesterol levels, but these drugs come at a high price, both costs and risks. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent marketing this class of pharmaceutical to the medical community and general public. Why is it important to take statin drugs and lower our cholesterol level? According to some in the medical field, it's to lower our risk of heart attack and heart disease. Lipitor's own ad states "has not been shown to reduce risk of heart attack…". If the statin does not reduce the risk of heart attack, why do we take it?, to lower cholesterol levels. Unfortunately lower cholesterol levels have not only NOT improved life expectancy, but actually increases risk of earlier mortality. Even though U.S. Government just lowered the acceptable cholesterol levels to 180, a 40,000-person study in Japan showed the ideal cholesterol level to be 240.

Statins are beginning to show higher rates of muscular and mental side effects then previously reported. In the Zocor study, and amazing 50% of the participants were rejected from the study during "lead in" phase, due to an inability to take or tolerate the drug. These participants were not counted in the study's reported side effect data. In addition, the study reports a 25% improvement in mortality, but this is relative measurement, not absolute. In absolute terms, there was only a 1.5% improvement. What's even scarier, if you have a heart attack, while taking statins, your risk of total heart failure actually INCREASES. This information is never presented.

Two of statins most often experienced side effects are serious muscle cramps and/or emotional irritability. These symptoms slowly become worse over time. Statins while doing a great job reducing cholesterol levels, also negatively reduce the much needed CoQ10, which muscles use for energy. Remember, the heart is a very powerful muscle and reducing it's source of energy can have a negative impact. One of the best summaries on statins can be found here . Searching the internet for statin problems, statin side effects, or brand specific searches will lead to literally thousands of pages. The medical community is becoming divided with a healthy skepticism towards claimed benefits of statins.

Just in case you trust your Dr. to properly research the drugs he prescribing, here's an interview with a former pharmaceutical rep. Confessions of a Rx Drug Pusher

Here are several additional very good web sites of information:

http://www.westonaprice.org/moderndiseases/statin.html One of the best summaries written

Presentation 1 of the Heart Protection Study data
Presentation 2 of the Heart Protection Study data

http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/cholesterol_myth_2.html - cholesterol myth

http://www.survivediabetes.com/lowfat.html - one of the diabetes links

http://www.becomehealthynow.com/ebookprint.php?id=1112 - article on blood fats

http://www.lowcarbluxury.com/sortingfacts.html - article on margarine

http://www.spacedoc.net - real life expose on lipitor...Lots of links

http://www.mercola.com - search on Statin

http://www.westonaprice.com - health site

http://thincs.org - cholesterol skeptics

http://www.spacedoc.net/board/ - Forum for Lipitor problems

http://www.rxlist.com/rxboard/lipitor.pl - Forum for Lipitor problems

http://www.healthboards.com/boards/forumdisplay.php?f=69 - Forum for high colesterol

http://www.mercola.com/2002/aug/17/saturated_fat1.htm - three part article on fats

Chris Gupta - Researchers funding cut off for not showing the correct results

New Statin Study evaluating the justification of lowering acceptable LDL from 130 to 70

Another study from Japan

Here is a quote from the framingham study director, which is the study most often quoted to justify lowering cholesterol
Framingham Study Comments

The ongoing Framingham Study found that there was virtually no difference in coronary heart disease (CHD) "events" for individuals with cholesterol levels between 205 mg/dL and 294 mg/dL - the vast majority of the US population. Even for those with extremely high cholesterol levels - up to almost 1,200 mg/dL - the difference in CHD events compared to those in the normal range was trivial.29 This did not prevent Dr William Kannel, then Framingham Study Director, from making claims about the Framingham results. "Total plasma cholesterol," he said, "is a powerful predictor of death related to CHD." It was not until more than a decade later, in 1992, that the real findings at Framingham were published - without fanfare - in the Archives of Internal Medicine, an obscure journal. "In Framingham, Massachusetts," admitted Dr William Castelli, Kannel's successor, "the more saturated fat one ate, the more cholesterol one ate, the more calories one ate, the lower people's serum cholesterol ... we found that the people who ate the most cholesterol, ate the most saturated fat, ate the most calories, weighed the least and were the most physically active."30
The NHLBI's Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) studied the relationship between heart disease and serum cholesterol levels in 362,000 men, and found that annual deaths from CHD varied from slightly less than one per thousand, for serum cholesterol levels below 140 mg/dL, to about two per thousand, for serum cholesterol levels above 300 mg/dL - once again, a trivial difference. Dr John LaRosa, of the American Heart Association (AHA), claimed that the curve for CHD deaths began to "inflect" after 200 mg/dL, when in fact the "curve" was a very gradually sloping straight line that could not be used to predict whether serum cholesterol above certain levels posed a significantly greater risk for heart disease.

About Us | Site Map-coming soon | Contact Us | ©2011